Is the new generation less materialistic?

This op-ed by Maurice Levy, chairman and chief executive officer of Publicis Groupe, in the New York Times takes an optimistic view of the rising generation of youth. They are, he says, post-materialistic and may bring a new post-consumerist global ethic into being. He starts by shooting at the gross materialism of the post-baby-boomer generation, which, he claims, led to the Enron and sub-prime mortgage disasters:

I believe that over the past 20 years (at least) the world has lost its bearings and has begun to wager with its moral values. Almost unnoticed, ethics have given way to cynical opportunism in business, in finance, in politics and in life in general.

How else can one explain the lies that were told to drag great nations into an unnecessary war in Iraq? Or the wholesale falsification of national accounts, as if states were hole-in-the-wall businesses scamming the tax man?

...

For all these betrayals of ethics, the bill is very high. It is being paid, in the first place, in millions of jobs destroyed, wealth vaporized and businesses weakened.

It is being paid also, and above all, in a crisis of confidence. A crisis that no financial rescue plan can make go away. People, consumers, employees, shareholders — who now has any confidence? In what? In whom?

Fortunately, I do believe a change is at hand. Consider our children and grandchildren who turn 20 this year. What value system is shaping their imagination and the world they want to create?

...

This new generation, activist and more inherently collective, is now taking the place of the post-Boomers, whose individualism and materialism may perhaps have contributed to the excesses for which we are now paying.

It is infinitely more connected, informed, alert and concerned than its predecessors. These young people are revolutionaries in their own way: They don’t march, but they are rethinking the world, challenging the very principles under which our society has lived since the Industrial Revolution.

They have a new post-materialist attitude to our economic and social system, to business and to consumption, that will shake our behavior and a good number of our certainties.

Today, it is our children who are shaping our ethics, not the other way around. With the firepower that comes from the click of a finger on a keyboard, or the mastery of SMS and social networks, they are changing society.

I think Maurice Levy has highlighted an important generational change, but he has not put this change in the much bigger context of the collapse of the old world order and the growth of a new order, founded firmly in the reality of human oneness and solidarity. This and the conscious development of virtues, such as honesty and trustworthiness, is what will prevent repeats of the kind of greed that led to financial meltdown and the current economic crisis.

The following comment is adapted from an unpublished paper by Baha'i scholar Matt Weinberg (Elements of A Conceptual Framework for Influencing Public Policy, 2006):

We should understand that incentives and penalties, new regulations, new rights and obligations, or creating new public authorities are not the only way of bringing about desired transformations in public behaviour. Collaborative generation of knowledge, education and persuasion are also highly effective in helping people to choose a path of social virtue and service to the common good '...when working to bring about constructive social transformation, the essential moral and spiritual forces animating human identity cannot be ignored.'

Binge-drinking: What happened to our sense of shame? - Telegraph

Shame and morality

Let's not beat about the bush! It's probably a deeply unfashionable thing to say, but those who drink themselves into vomiting insensibility in the way John Humphrys describes in his article are behaving immorally.

Why immorally? Because their conduct denies their God-given nobility of character - and this is a deeply immoral thing to do, in my view, at least.

In one of His Hidden Words, Baha'u'llah, Founder of the Baha'i Faith, says this:

O Son of Spirit! Noble have I created thee, yet thou hast abased thyself. Rise then unto that for which thou wast created.

Baha'u'llah teaches that human beings are mines "rich in gems", packed with God-given talents and capacities - including moral capacities. It is our choice whether we rise to that for which we are created. Do we choose for ourselves a noble goal, as the Baha'i Writings call on us to do? Do we choose to be of service to our fellow human beings? Or do we choose to give free reign to what the Baha'i teachings refer to as the animal side of our dual nature?

In the past a sense of shame would have limited our excesses. Now, we seem to have lost our susceptibility to the social disapproval that leads to our feeling ashamed.

We need to replace this with a deeper understanding of our true, noble and spiritual nature. That deeper understanding will lead us to aspire to be noble and behave in a noble manner. Fear of God - the other side of the coin of reward and punishment, which, Baha'u'llah says, are the two pillars of justice in the world - will restrain us from our own folly.

Moral education

The spiritual and moral education that leads us to embrace our nobility and to use our talents and capacities in service to our fellow human beings has to start young. It needs to be a foundational part of our educational system, including what our children learn in their families.

Binge drinking

By John Humphrys
Published: 7:17PM BST 17 Apr 2010

There was a time – before universities started offering “media studies” courses – when young reporters like me cut their journalistic teeth on local papers. We did our porridge covering council meetings and magistrates’ courts and God help us if we spelt someone’s name incorrectly. It’s fair to say that most cases were not exciting. Most of the miscreants in the magistrates’ courts I covered as a fresh-faced 16-year-old in South Wales were up either for being drunk and disorderly or for urinating in a public place. Often both. They’d be fined five shillings and told to go away and stop doing it. Even in those far-off days, five bob was a pretty modest fine and I wondered why the police bothered arresting them.

“It’s the shame,” a seasoned old inspector told me. “They know you’ll put their name in the paper and everyone will read it and that’s what hurts.”

Binge-drinking
I thought about shame when I stood in the streets of Cardiff on a Saturday night a couple of weeks ago. I wondered what had happened to it. I also wondered how the magistrates would cope if everyone I saw who was drunk and disorderly or urinating in the street ended up in front of them the next day. Not that there was the remotest chance of that. The local police I spoke to laughed at the idea of arresting every rowdy drunk or urinating yob. They would have to do something much more serious to get arrested and locked up – which indeed some did while I was there. The police sergeant showing me around was injured when he courageously intervened in a fight. That, he said, was par for the course for Friday and Saturday nights.

Far from putting a stop to the drunkenness, the best the police can hope to do is contain it. They close the road and seal off the part of the city centre with the most pubs so that it effectively becomes a no-go area for people who just want a pleasant night out with a meal and a quiet drink.

It was the news editor on my first local paper who introduced me to the five questions that, he said solemnly, all competent journalists should address: Who? What? Where? When? Why? So let’s apply them to what I found in Cardiff.

The “who” isn’t as obvious as it might seem. It’s not just young men, it’s women, too. At least as many females as males. I met the so-called “street pastors”, who operate around the country, usually patrolling with the police and helping people too drunk to help themselves. In Cardiff they carry a stack of flip-flops and give them to women who are so drunk they can’t move around in their high heels –assuming they haven’t simply lost their shoes. And they’re not all young.

The “what” is entirely obvious. They go out to get drunk and they are utterly unashamed of the fact. Indeed, they boast about it. If that means they end up urinating and vomiting in the streets, so be it. That, as my friendly police officer told me, is seen as an incidental by-product of a good night out.

The “where” and the “when” are easy to answer too. It’s just about everywhere. Cardiff is not some hellish exception. Much the same happens in towns and city centres – and, yes, even some villages. And it happens pretty well every weekend. It’s the “why” that’s tricky.

Read the rest of this post »